The Irish Times appealed a decision by the Press Ombudsman to uphold a complaint that an article published by The Irish Times breached Principle 1 and 4 of the Press Council’s Code of Practice.
The Irish Times submitted their appeal on the grounds that;
The procedures followed in making the decision were not in accordance with the published procedures, and
That there was an error in the Press Ombudsman’s application of Principle 1 and Principle 4 of the Code of Practice.
At its meeting on 20 May 2026, the Press Council considered the appeal on the grounds relied upon and on the information, documentation and submissions provided to the appeal.
Appeal Decision
The Press Council has rejected the appeal on the ground that the procedures followed in making the decision were not in accordance with the published procedures for considering complaints. It decided that the Press Ombudsman was not required to consider the two articles together.
The Press Council has rejected the appeal that there has been an error in the application of the Principles of the Code of Practice.
In regard to Principle 1, it decided that the Press Ombudsman had not erred in her application of the requirement to meet the necessary standard of truth and accuracy.
In regard to Principle 4 it decided that the Press Ombudsman had not erred in her application of the requirement to take reasonable care in checking facts before publication.